Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Mar 2;46(7):3387–3400. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-02982-4

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis*
β SE OR P β SE OR P

Serum PSA 0.056 0.020 1.058 0.004
Biopsy Gleason grade groups 0.932 0.320 2.539 0.004
PCa stiffness at 60 Hz 2.167 0.642 8.732 0.001 3.007 1.215 20.223 0.013
PCa stiffness at 90 Hz 2.219 0.740 9.201 0.003 2.069 0.833 7.920 0.013
Maximum diameter of PCa 1.271 0.388 3.566 0.001 1.521 (1.033**) 0.762 (0.515) 4.575 (2.810) 0.046 (0.045)
ADC −7.413 3.383 0.001 0.028
PCa invasiveness 3.011 1.100 20.308 0.006
LN with restricted diffusion 2.344 1.095 10.421 0.032

SE standard error, OR odds ratio, PSA prostate specific antigen, RP radical prostatectomy, PCa prostate cancer, MRE MR elastography, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, LN lymph node

*

Because there was collinearity between PCa MRE stiffness at 60 Hz and at 90 Hz, two multivariable models were fitted, respectively, according to forward stepwise regression based on maximum likelihood estimation. In model 1, PCa MRE stiffness at 60 Hz and maximum diameter were independent significant variables for predicting LNM of PCa. In model 2, PCa MRE stiffness at 90 Hz and maximum diameter were independent significant predictors

**

The numbers in parentheses indicated that the corresponding values in model 2