Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predicting lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer
Variable | Univariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis* |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | OR | P | β | SE | OR | P | |
| ||||||||
Serum PSA | 0.056 | 0.020 | 1.058 | 0.004 | ||||
Biopsy Gleason grade groups | 0.932 | 0.320 | 2.539 | 0.004 | ||||
PCa stiffness at 60 Hz | 2.167 | 0.642 | 8.732 | 0.001 | 3.007 | 1.215 | 20.223 | 0.013 |
PCa stiffness at 90 Hz | 2.219 | 0.740 | 9.201 | 0.003 | 2.069 | 0.833 | 7.920 | 0.013 |
Maximum diameter of PCa | 1.271 | 0.388 | 3.566 | 0.001 | 1.521 (1.033**) | 0.762 (0.515) | 4.575 (2.810) | 0.046 (0.045) |
ADC | −7.413 | 3.383 | 0.001 | 0.028 | ||||
PCa invasiveness | 3.011 | 1.100 | 20.308 | 0.006 | ||||
LN with restricted diffusion | 2.344 | 1.095 | 10.421 | 0.032 |
SE standard error, OR odds ratio, PSA prostate specific antigen, RP radical prostatectomy, PCa prostate cancer, MRE MR elastography, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, LN lymph node
Because there was collinearity between PCa MRE stiffness at 60 Hz and at 90 Hz, two multivariable models were fitted, respectively, according to forward stepwise regression based on maximum likelihood estimation. In model 1, PCa MRE stiffness at 60 Hz and maximum diameter were independent significant variables for predicting LNM of PCa. In model 2, PCa MRE stiffness at 90 Hz and maximum diameter were independent significant predictors
The numbers in parentheses indicated that the corresponding values in model 2