Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;18:408–417. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.09.009

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of prospective Ischemic Stroke treatments.

Treatment Advantages Disadvantages
MSCs Abundant, No Ethical Problems, Can Differentiate into Mature Neurons, Beneficial Cytokines, Most Studied Stem Cell Type Vary from different sources and show different efficacy in different patients, risk for infection
NSCs Cell Replacement and Paracrine Potential, Positive Results in Clinical Trials Ethical Problems, Limited Cell Sources, risk for infection
Other Stem Cells (DPSCs, HFSCs) DPSCs: Superior to MSCs in Pre-clinical Models, Easily Obtainable, Increased Homing to Ischemic Areas
HFSCs: Easily Obtainable, Can Cross BBB Without BBB Permeabilizer
Difficult to keep quality control, not fully explored yet, risk for infection
Modified Stem Cells Better localization and can be used to address all the limitations from other sources Safety issue of materials
Risk for infection
Extracellular Vesicles Smaller in size, can easily cross BBB, easy to modify Difficult to characterize and monitor inside the system, limited numbers
Conditioned Media Paracrine Effects, fewer side effects compared to cell transplantation Risk for contamination of unknown components