Table 2.
Unadjusted outcomes at baseline and follow-up by narrator (N=122)a.
| Characteristics | Total | Peer | Provider | P value | |||||
| Past 2-week binge use (self-reported), n (%) | |||||||||
|
|
Baseline (any) | 43 (35.2) | 21 (33.3) | 22 (37.3) | .65 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up (any) | 26 (21.3) | 14 (22.2) | 12 (20.3) | .80 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus baseline | –13.9 | –11.1 | –16.9 | .48 | ||||
| Knowledge summaryb | |||||||||
|
|
Baseline, mean (SD) | 8.11 (1.58) | 8.35 (1.30) | 7.86 (1.81) | .20 | ||||
|
|
Postintervention, mean (SD) | 8.84 (1.28) | 8.97 (1.15) | 8.69 (1.41) | .27 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up, mean (SD) | 8.78 (1.29) | 8.95 (0.92) | 8.59 (1.58) | .32 | ||||
|
|
Difference at postintervention versus baseline | +0.72 | +0.62 | +0.83 | .75 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus baseline | +0.66 | +0.60 | +0.73 | .97 | ||||
| Attitude summaryc | |||||||||
|
|
Baseline, mean (SD) | 7.66 (1.38) | 7.71 (1.27) | 7.61 (1.50) | .81 | ||||
|
|
Postintervention, mean (SD) | 7.87 (1.25) | 7.84 (1.21) | 7.91 (1.29) | .63 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up, mean (SD) | 7.72 (1.24) | 7.68 (1.24) | 7.76 (1.24) | .77 | ||||
|
|
Difference at postintervention versus baseline | +0.22 | +0.13 | +0.31 | .20 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus baseline | +0.06 | –0.03 | +0.15 | .44 | ||||
| Concern summaryd | |||||||||
|
|
Baseline, mean (SD) | 3.10 (1.62) | 2.92 (1.67) | 3.29 (1.55) | .23 | ||||
|
|
Postintervention, mean (SD) | 3.33 (1.67) | 3.09 (1.76) | 3.58 (1.55) | .15 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up, mean (SD) | 3.13 (1.70) | 2.80 (1.72) | 3.48 (1.62) | .02 | ||||
|
|
Difference at postintervention versus baseline | +0.23 | +0.17 | +0.29 | .84 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus baseline | +0.03 | –0.12 | +0.19 | .14 | ||||
| Intention summarye | |||||||||
|
|
Postintervention, mean (SD) | 5.13 (1.39) | 4.94 (1.43) | 5.33 (1.33) | .10 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up, mean (SD) | 4.80 (1.18) | 4.76 (1.25) | 4.84 (1.10) | .67 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus postintervention | –0.33 | –0.18 | –0.49 | .08 | ||||
| Impression summaryf | |||||||||
|
|
Postintervention, mean (SD) | 7.28 (1.48) | 6.95 (1.67) | 7.64 (1.14) | .03 | ||||
|
|
Follow-up, mean (SD) | 7.07 (1.53) | 6.94 (1.68) | 7.22 (1.35) | .38 | ||||
|
|
Difference at follow-up versus postintervention | –0.21 | –0.01 | –0.42 | .07 | ||||
| In past 2 weeks...(at follow-up), n (%) | |||||||||
|
|
Talked with anyone about alcohol and type 1 diabetes | 68 (55.7) | 39 (61.9) | 29 (49.2) | .16 | ||||
|
|
Always tested before, during, or after drinking | 54 (44.3) | 23 (36.5) | 31 (52.5) | .07 | ||||
aP values compare the peer versus provider arms.
bThe knowledge summary indicates the number of correct items out of a total of 10 items.
cThe attitude summary reflects the mean (SD) score across six items for drinkers and four items for nondrinkers; the response options ranged from “strongly disagree” (score=1) to “strongly agree” (score=10).
dThe concern summary reflects the mean (SD) score across seven items; the response options ranged from “not concerned” (score=0) to “very concerned” (score=6).
eThe intention summary reflects the mean (SD) score across 10 items for drinkers and eight items for nondrinkers; the response options ranged from “definitely will not” (score=1) to “definitely will” (score=8).
fThe impression summary reflects the mean (SD) score across 12 items; the response options ranged from “strongly disagree” (score=1) to “strongly agree” (score=10).