Table 1. Data-collection and refinement statistics.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
Data collection | |
Wavelength (Å) | 0.95370 |
Space group | P6522 |
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) | a = b = 92.22, c = 365.12, α = β = 90, γ = 120 |
Resolution (Å) | 33.39–2.55 (2.66–2.55) |
Observed reflections | 342621 |
Unique reflections | 33107 |
R merge † (%) | 13.3 (78.4) |
〈I/σ(I)〉 | 9.3 (2.0) |
CC1/2 ‡ | 0.996 (0.766) |
Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
Multiplicity | 9.6 (9.7) |
Refinement | |
Resolution (Å) | 33.39–2.55 (2.61–2.55) |
Reflections in working set | 29544 |
Reflections in test set | 1581 |
R work (%) | 25.9 (36.4) |
R free § (%) | 28.7 (39.2) |
No. of non-H atoms | |
Protein | 4775 |
Ligand/ion | 94 |
Water | 4 |
B factors (Å2) | |
Protein | 63.4 |
Ligand/ion | 77.7 |
Water | 40.0 |
R.m.s. deviations¶ | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.004 |
Bond angles (°) | 0.8 |
Ramachandran plot†† | |
Most favoured (%) | 96.6 |
Allowed (%) | 3.1 |
Outliers (%) | 0.3 |
PDB code | 4xs0 |
R merge = \textstyle \sum_{hkl}\sum_{i}|I_{i}(hkl)- \langle I(hkl)\rangle|/\textstyle \sum_{hkl}\sum_{i}I_{i}(hkl).
Values of CC1/2 according to Karplus & Diederichs (2012 ▸).
R free was calculated using 5% of the reflections, which were chosen at random and excluded from the data set.
Deviations from ideal values (Engh & Huber, 1991 ▸).
Calculated using MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010 ▸).