Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2021 Jul 14;109(17):2781–2796.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.019

Figure 8. Egocentric bearing cells activate during successful episodic memory recall.

Figure 8.

(A) Schematic for location-cued object recall. (B and C) Firing rates of EBCs (B) and non-spatial cells (C) during successful vs. unsuccessful object recall. (D) Interaction effect showing a significant difference between the activity of EBCs and non-spatial cells during successful vs. unsuccessful recall periods. (E) Schematic for object-cued location recall. (F and G) Response-locked firing rates of EBCs (F) and non-spatial cells (G) during successful vs. unsuccessful location recall. (H) Interaction effect showing a significant difference between the activity of EBCs and non-spatial cells during successful vs. unsuccessful recall periods. Firing rates in B, C, D, F, G, and H are baseline-corrected with respect to a one-second baseline interval before the onset of the recall period. In B, C, F, and G: black shadings at top, significant clusters of firing-rate differences between successful and unsuccessful recall periods (cluster-based permutation tests, P < 0.05); gray shadings, significant deviations of firing rates from 0 during successful recall periods (cluster-based permutation tests, P < 0.05). In D and H, black shadings indicate significant interaction effects (cluster-based permutation tests, P < 0.05). All cluster-based permutation tests control for multiple comparisons across the entire time window.