Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;41(10):2371–2382. doi: 10.1111/liv.14963

TABLE 3.

Association of TMAO with all‐cause mortality, assessed with Cox proportional hazard ratios in subjects with NAFLD (FLI ≥ 60)

TMAO per 1 Ln SD increment T1 T2 T3
Participants, n 1598 533 532 533
Events, n 133 25 45 63
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Crude model 1.41 (1.18, 1.69) <.001 (ref) 1.80 (1.10, 2.93) .01 2.55 (1.60, 4.05) <.001
Model 1 1.25 (1.04, 1.49) .01 (ref) 1.66 (1.02, 2.70) .04 2.16 (1.36, 3.44) .01
Model 2 1.24 (1.04, 1.48) .02 (ref) 1.66 (1.02, 2.71) .04 2.01 (1.26, 3.21) .003
Model 3 1.23 (1.03, 1.47) .03 (ref) 1.71 (1.04, 2.79) .03 1.96 (1.23, 3.12) .005
Model 4 1.21 (1.01, 1.46) .04 (ref) 1.69 (1.03, 2.77) .04 1.90 (1.18, 3.04) .008

Data are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values. Model 1: Model adjusted for age + sex. Model 2: Model 1 + SBP + smoking status + alcohol consumption + cancer history + glucose lowering medication + lipid lowering medication. Model 3: Model 2 + TC + HDL‐C + Glucose. Model 4: Model 3 + albuminuria + reduced eGFR (<90 ml/min/1.73 m2).