Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;41(10):2371–2382. doi: 10.1111/liv.14963

TABLE 4.

Association of TMAO with all‐cause mortality, assessed with Cox proportional hazard ratios in subjects without NAFLD (FLI < 60)

TMAO per 1 Ln

SD increment

T1 T2 T3
Participants, n 3694 1232 1231 1231
Events, n 174 51 62 61
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Crude Model 1.14 (0.98, 1.33) .09 (ref) 1.22 (0.84, 1.76) .30 1.18 (0.81, 1.71) .39
Model 1 1.02 (0.87, 1.20) .81 (ref) 0.86 (0.59, 1.24) .41 0.90 (0.62, 1.31) .59
Model 2 1.07 (0.91, 1.26) .41 (ref) 0.90 (0.62, 1.30) .56 0.94 (0.65, 1.37) .75
Model 3 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) .42 (ref) 0.90 (0.62, 1.31) .56 0.94 (0.65, 1.37) .75
Model 4 1.07 (0.91, 1.26) .42 (ref) 0.91 (0.62, 1.32) .61 0.95 (0.65, 1.39) .78

Data are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P values. Model 1: Model adjusted for age + sex. Model 2: Model 1 + SBP + smoking status + alcohol consumption + cancer history + glucose lowering medication + lipid lowering medication. Model 3: Model 2 + TC + HDL‐C + glucose. Model 4: Model 3 + albuminuria + reduced eGFR (<90 ml/min/1.73 m2).