TABLE 1.
The populations included in the simulations and sequenced with RADseq (note: neither wilderness park was sequenced as these are captive populations). The number of samples included in the selection detection analyses and estimated means of key environmental parameters from the weather stations in Figure 1 are shown. Also shown is the simulated environmental optimum. Positive and negative values of the simulated optimums were based on the relative difference in snow depth between each population and the Gran Paradiso population. An optimum of zero was used for the burn‐in
| Population | Sample size used in selection scan | Real winter snow depth (cm) | Real summer precipitation (mm) | Simulated optimum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gran Paradiso | NA | 115 | 2.8 | 0 |
| Wilderness Park Peter and Paul | NA | NA | NA | –2 |
| Wilderness Park Interlaken Harder | NA | NA | NA | –2 |
| Graue Hoerner | 7 | 28 | 5.0 | –2 |
| Albris | 11 | 120 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Brienzer‐Rothorn | 10 | NA | 4.8 | 0 |
| Schwarmoench | 9 | 27 | 4.2 | –2 |
| Wetterhorn | 10 | 185 | 4.7 | 0 |
| Mont Pleureur | 10 | NA | 5.2 | –2 |
| Justistal | 9 | NA | 4.8 | 0 |
| Gross Lohner | 10 | 28 | 4.2 | –2 |
| Alpstein | 10 | 266 | 7.2 | 2 |
| Val Bever | 6 | 30 | 2.6 | –2 |
| Crap da Flem | 10 | 27 | 5.0 | –2 |
| Flueela | 9 | 145 | 4.2 | 0 |
| Wittenberg | 10 | NA | 3.3 | 0 |
| Arolla | 10 | 20 | 2.4 | –2 |
| Bire‐Oeschinen | 10 | 27 | 4.2 | –2 |
| Creux du Van | 9 | NA | 3.8 | 0 |
| Pilatus | 9 | NA | 4.8 | 0 |
| Fluebrig | 10 | 27 | 5.0 | –2 |
| Weisshorn | 7 | 34 | 2.1 | –2 |
| Oberbauenstock | 10 | 18 | 5.0 | –2 |
| Falknis | 9 | 145 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Tanay | 8 | 1 | 3.2 | –2 |
| Churfirsten | 10 | 277 | 7.5 | 2 |