Table 1.

Three Types of Collaborative Performance Regimes

	Actor‐Centric Performance Regime	Hybrid Performance Regime	Network‐Centric Performance Regime
Actors in performance regime	Actors working on the same issue occasionally cooperate with others when necessary to achieve their own ambitions	Actors working on the same societal issue selectively coordinate their routines to achieve overlapping ambitions	Actors working on the same societal issue develop collaborative routines to achieve shared ambitions
Performance goals	Actors maintain separate goals but pursue their aims in conjunction with other actors to address societal challenges	Mix of separate goals at actor‐level and a limited number of shared goals supported by multiple actors	Shared, cross‐cutting goals at network level, supported by all participating actors
Performance information	Each actor collects its own performance information, which may be shared upon request with other actors	Regular, separate performance collection at actor‐level, with targeted information‐sharing for specific shared activities	Regular, joint performance information collected by partners on a network basis
Performance assessment	Each actor conducts its own performance review with assessments selectively shared with other actors	Regular, separate performance reviews at actor‐level alongside targeted joint reviews on specific shared activities	Regular, joint performance reviews at network‐level by all partners
Performance actions	Lessons from separate reviews translated into distinctive actions for each actor and communicated to other partners when relevant	Lessons from separate and joint reviews translated to action by each actor separately, with some coordination among actors	Lessons from joint review collectively translated to changes, implemented across all partners