Table 2.

Three Collaborative Performance Regimes

	Street Prostitution	Childhood Obesity	Sports and Alcohol
Actors in performance regime	Police, social workers, doctors, local government	Schools, public health authority, private health insurer, sport clubs, local government	Private health insurer, sport clubs, addiction center, local government
Performance goals	No overarching plan for zone; some generic ambitions to keep zone safe and secure	Overarching reduction target set by local council; specific goals for specific projects	Shared ambitions explicated in covenant, though without quantifying goals
Performance information	Regular on‐the‐ground information‐sharing, but no structured exchanges about overall performance	Information exchange within projects; yearly city‐wide survey of the obesity rate	Ongoing information‐sharing between the various initiatives
Performance assessment	No joint assessment among on‐the‐ground partners; frequent debate about zone among politicians	Joint assessment of specific projects, no collective reviews of overall initiative	Ongoing assessments of initiatives; commitment to joint review at end of covenant period
Performance actions	Regular on‐the‐ground learning and follow‐up, but no overall joint policy formulation	Occasional adjustments after review of projects, no overall joint review of actions	Commitment to improve and adapt initiative after four years