Actors in performance routine |
Diversity of actors present, but not all relevant actors are willing to join the summit |
Comprehensive range of actors present, ranging from teachers to policy makers, health experts to citizen volunteers |
Small, but diverse set of actors present, representing different roles and perspectives related to the initiatives |
Explicating performance goals |
Summit starts with lengthy search for what community wants to achieve, revealing mainly harm avoidance goals |
Government had pre‐set focus on BMI reduction, but summit establishes broader goals around well‐being |
Goals were vaguely specified in covenant and actors mainly discuss potential trade‐offs between them |
Exchanging performance information |
Street‐level professionals share anecdotal insight into daily reality of zone |
Highly diverse information ranging from anecdotes to large health survey are discussed, actors seeking ways to tie data together |
Broad goals make selecting key info difficult. Actors share statistics, personal experiences, expert opinion |
Examining performance progress |
Progress is hard to assess as the main goal is harm avoidance for an otherwise stubborn problem |
Unstructured review of evidence on what progress is made, focusing mainly on gaps in approach |
Progress difficult to track, street‐level partners show potential trade‐offs are not problematic, provide small win evidence |
Exploring performance actions |
Summit is concluded without agreeing on anything, although all partners have a better view of the problem |
Summit leads to abolishment of targets and a shift towards a more network‐centric approach |
Summit leads to re‐shaping the initiative in a more hierarchical fashion as councilors conclude learning stage is over |