Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):363–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.013

Table 3.

Criteria for Surgical Management Options of Stable Peyronie’s Disease

AUA (2015) CUA (2018) EAU (2020) ISSM (2016)
Plication -Stable PD
-Adequate erectile rigidity with or without pharmacotherapy or VED
(Grade C)
-Stable PD
-Adequate erections with or without pharmacotherapy
-Adequate penile length
-Curve that is “reasonably correctable with this approach”
-Minimal/absent hourglass + hinge
(Level 3; Grade C)
-Stable PD
-Adequate erections with or without pharmacotherapy
-Adequate penile length
-Absence of complex deformity (hourglass, hinge)
-“Non-severe” curvature
(Level 3; Weak)
-Stable PD-
-Adequate erections with or without pharmacotherapy
-Adequate penile length
-Minimal to moderate curvature
-Absence of hourglass causing hinge
(Level 3; Grade B)
 Preferred plication technique Not specifically addressed Dependent on surgeon and patient factors -Dependent on surgeon and patient preference
-No procedure with proven superiority
-No surgical procedure with proven superiority
Incision or excision and grafting -Stable PD
-Adequate erectile rigidity with or without pharmacotherapy or VED
(Grade C)
-Stable PD
-Adequate erections with or without pharmacotherapy
-Short penile length
-Severe curvature > 60°
-Large penile plaques
-Complex indentation or hourglass
(Level 3; Grade C)
-Stable PD
-Adequate erections with or without pharmacotherapy
-Significant penile shortening
-Severe penile curvature (>60°commonly cited but, per the guideline panel experts there is no unanimous consensus to support this threshold)
-Complex deformities (hourglass, hinge)
(Level 3; Weak)
-Stable PD
-“Good” erectile function
-Significant curvature and/or Indentation/hourglass deformity (with or without
-Concerns regarding further penile length loss
(Level 3; Grade B)
 Preferred graft material Not addressed -No preferred graft
-Recommend against synthetic grafts
(Level 3; Grade C)
-No preferred graft material
-Recommend against synthetic grafts
(Strong)
-No ideal/preferred graft
-Synthetic grafts not recommended
Penile prosthesis with adjunctive procedures* -Stable PD
-ED and/or penile deformity that impairs coitus (despite pharmacotherapy or VED)
(Grade C)
-Stable PD
-ED non-responsive to pharmacotherapy
-Severe deformity refractory to non-surgical management
-failed plication or grafting
-Profound penile instability (buckling or hinge)
(Level 3; Grade C)
-Stable PD
-ED unresponsive to pharmacotherapy
(Level 2a; Strong)
-Stable PD
-ED with inadequate response to pharmacotherapy or VED
-Complex deformity
(Level 3; Grade B)
 Preferred prosthesis -Inflatable prosthesis is preferred
(Expert opinion)
-Inflatable prosthesis is preferred
(Level 3; Grade C)
-Inflatable prosthesis classically considered more effective
-Malleable with similar satisfaction rates
-Patient and surgeon preference should determine device type and model
-Inflatable penile prosthesis associated with higher satisfaction and lower persistent curvature compared with malleable
-Similar outcomes with commercially available inflatable prosthesis models
*

Adjunctive procedures may include manual modeling, plication, incision, or grafting