Table 4.

Path analysis of the effects of the intervention on the believability profile.

Dependent variables		Odds ratio	SE	Lower CI	Upper CI	z	P value	AICa
Multinomial analysis: Profile Twob								416.88
	Direct effect	0.96	0.35	0.28	1.64	–0.10	.92
	Indirect effect	0.92	0.04	0.84	1.00	–1.95	.051
	Total effect	0.89	0.32	0.25	1.52	–0.34	.74
Multinomial analysis: Profile Threeb
	Direct effect	0.98	0.22	0.54	1.41	–0.11	.91
	Indirect effect	0.95	0.02	0.90	1.00	–1.82	.07
	Total effect	0.93	0.21	0.52	1.35	–0.32	.75
Binomial analysis: Profile Onec
	Direct effect	1.03	0.21	0.61	1.45	0.16	.88	214.38
	Indirect effect	1.06	0.03	1.00	1.12	2.01	.045
	Total effect	1.10	0.23	0.65	1.54	0.44	.66
Binomial analysis: Profile Twoc
	Direct effect	1.00	0.35	0.31	1.70	0.01	.99	–147.42
	Indirect effect	0.93	0.04	0.86	1.00	–1.84	.07
	Total effect	0.94	0.33	0.28	1.59	–0.19	.85
Binomial analysis: Profile Threec
	Direct effect	1.00	0.22	0.56	1.43	0.00	1.00	146.46
	Indirect effect	0.97	0.02	0.93	1.01	–1.56	.12
	Total effect	0.97	0.22	0.55	1.39	–0.15	.88

^aAIC: Akaike information criterion.

^bReference is Profile One.

^cEach profile is a dummy variable.