Table 5.

Path analysis of effects of the intervention on preventive behaviors (1-factor solution).

Mediators		Coefficient	SE	Lower CI	Upper CI	z	P value	AICa
Multinomial analysis: Profile Twob
	Direct effect	–0.04	0.04	–0.12	0.05	–0.85	.39	3018.13
	Indirect effect	0.05	0.22	–0.38	0.49	0.23	.82
	Total effect	0.01	0.23	–0.43	0.46	0.06	.95
Multinomial analysis: Profile Threeb
	Direct effect	–0.04	0.04	–0.12	0.05	–0.85	.39
	Indirect effect	0.04	0.15	–0.26	0.33	0.24	.82
	Total effect	0.00	0.16	–0.30	0.30	0.00	1.00
Binomial analysis: Profile Onec
	Direct effect	–0.04	0.04	–0.12	0.05	–0.86	.39	2814.37
	Indirect effect	0.05	0.13	–0.22	0.31	0.35	.73
	Total effect	0.01	0.14	–0.27	0.29	0.07	.94
Binomial analysis: Profile Twoc
	Direct effect	–0.03	0.05	–0.12	0.06	–0.70	.48	2528.63
	Indirect effect	0.01	0.15	–0.28	0.31	0.10	.92
	Total effect	–0.02	0.16	–0.32	0.29	–0.11	.91
Binomial analysis: Profile Threec
	Direct effect	–0.03	0.04	–0.12	0.05	–0.76	.45	2763.44
	Indirect effect	0.01	0.13	–0.24	0.27	0.08	.93
	Total effect	–0.02	0.14	–0.29	0.25	–0.17	.87

^aAIC: Akaike information criterion.

^bReference is Profile One.

^cEach profile is a dummy variable.