Table 6.

Multinomial path analysis of the effects of the intervention on preventive behaviors (2-factor solution), in which the reference is Profile One.

Mediator		Coefficient	SE	Lower CI	Upper CI	z	P value	AICa
Factor 1bas the dependent variable: Profile Two								3376.55
	Direct effect	–0.03	0.05	–0.13	0.07	–0.62	.53
	Indirect effect	0.03	0.13	–0.22	0.28	0.23	.82
	Total effect	0.00	0.14	–0.27	0.26	–0.02	.98
Factor 1b as the dependent variable: Profile Three
	Direct effect	–0.03	0.05	–0.13	0.07	–0.62	.53
	Indirect effect	0.02	0.07	–0.12	0.15	0.24	.81
	Total effect	–0.02	0.09	–0.18	0.15	–0.18	.86
Factor 2c as the dependent variable: Profile Two								3440.75
	Direct effect	–0.04	0.05	–0.15	0.06	–0.81	.42
	Indirect effect	0.08	0.35	–0.61	0.77	0.23	.82
	Total effect	0.04	0.35	–0.66	0.73	0.11	.92
Factor 2c as the dependent variable: Profile Three
	Direct effect	–0.04	0.05	–0.15	0.06	–0.81	.42
	Indirect effect	0.06	0.26	–0.44	0.57	0.24	.81
	Total effect	0.02	0.26	–0.49	0.53	0.07	.94

^aAIC: Akaike information criterion.

^bPreventive behaviors 1, 4, 5, and 6.

^cPreventive behaviors 2, 3, and 7.