Table 3.
Association between predictor variables and Taenia prevalence among pigs.
| Taenia solium (IgG) | Negative | Positive | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Col (%) | Row (%) | N | Col (%) | Row (%) | N | Col (%) | Row (%) | Prevalence (%) | |
| Municipality | ||||||||||
| AMA | 58 | 31.5 | 100 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 58 | 23.7 | 100 | 0.0 |
| Bawku West | 2 | 1.1 | 22.2 | 7 | 11.5 | 77.8 | 9 | 3.7 | 100 | 77.8 |
| Bolgatanga | 85 | 46.2 | 62 | 52 | 85.2 | 38 | 137 | 55.9 | 100 | 38.0 |
| Navrongo | 1 | 0.5 | 33.3 | 2 | 3.3 | 66.7 | 3 | 1.2 | 100 | 66.7 |
| LEKMA | 22 | 12 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 22 | 9.0 | 100 | 0.0 |
| Weija-Gbawe | 16 | 8.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16 | 6.5 | 100 | 0.0 |
| Total | 184 | 100.0 | 75.1 | 61 | 100.0 | 24.9 | 245 | 100 | 100 | 24.9 |
| Pearson′s Chi2(5) = 60.5772p ≤ 0.001 | ||||||||||
| Pig management system | ||||||||||
| Confined | 22 | 12 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 9.0 | 100 | 0.0 |
| Free-ranged | 162 | 88 | 72.6 | 61 | 100 | 27.4 | 223 | 91.0 | 100 | 27.4 |
| Total | 184 | 100 | 75.1 | 61 | 100 | 24.9 | 245 | 100.0 | 100 | 24.9 |
| Pearson′s Chi2(1) = 8.0130p = 0.005 | ||||||||||