. 2021 Oct 16;191(5):2117–2121. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02812-y

Table.3.

The difference in ankle X-rays between the pre-VFC and VFC groups

Ankle injury	Pre-VFC mean X-rays (95% CI) (Number)	VFC mean X-rays (95% CI) (Number)	Welch t test	Mean change (95% CI)
No fracture	1.692 (1.238, 2.146) (n=30)	1.281 (1.093, 1.470) (n=32)	P = 0.049	− 0.352 (− 0.0021, − 0.702)
Weber A Weber B	2.323 (2.005, 2.642) (n=34) 4.5 (4.012, 4.988) (n=30)	1.417 (1.197, 1.636) (n=36) 3.714 (2.331, 5.098) (n=7)	P = 0.000013* P = 0.235	− 0.907 (− 0.526, − 1.287) − 0.786 (0.621, − 2.192)

Ankle injury

Pre-VFC mean X-rays (95% CI) (Number)

VFC mean X-rays
(95% CI) (Number)

Welch t test

Mean change
(95% CI)

No fracture

1.692 (1.238, 2.146) (n=30)

1.281 (1.093, 1.470) (n=32)

P = 0.049

− 0.352 (− 0.0021, − 0.702)

Weber A

Weber B

2.323 (2.005, 2.642) (n=34)

4.5 (4.012, 4.988) (n=30)

1.417 (1.197, 1.636) (n=36)

3.714 (2.331, 5.098) (n=7)

P = 0.000013*

P = 0.235

− 0.907 (− 0.526, − 1.287)

− 0.786 (0.621, − 2.192)

*Statistically significant