Table 1.
Comparisons of the different algorithms for the detection of 3GCREB carriers by using McNemar
| Stool without pre-enrichment (A) | Stool with pre-enrichment (B) | Rectal swab without pre-enrichment (C) | Rectal swab with pre-enrichment (D) | Stool total (A + B) | Rectal swab total (C + D) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stool without pre-enrichment (A)a | X | X | 98.3/0.6875 | X | X | X |
| Stool with pre-enrichment (B)a | 95.5/0.0042 | X | 94.9/0.0013 | 93.8/0.8318 | X | 93.8/1 |
| Rectal swab without pre-enrichment (C)a | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Rectal swab with pre-enrichment (D)a | 95.5/0.0213 | X | 95.5/0.0042 | X | X | X |
| Stool total (A + B)a | 96.1/0.0001 | 99.4/0.5 | 94.9/0.0001 | 93.8/0.5235 | X | 93.8/0,8318 |
| Rectal swab total (C + D)a | 95.5/0.0042 | 93.8/1 | 96.1/0.0001 | 99.4/0.5 | X | X |
The approach with the better performance is in each comparison located in the slot on the left side
aOverall percent agreement (%)/p value