. 2021 Jul 16;7(4):443–449.

Table 2. Spearman’s rho correlations (R²) between VOMS Score and NPC to significant group difference Tandem gait times along with center of pressure variables on the instrumented tandem gait.

TG Time	Total Time	First Pass Time	Turn Time	Second Pass Time
VOMS Score	0.41* (0.17)	0.39* (0.15)	0.27* (0.07)	0.39* (0.15)
NPC	0.14 (.02)	0.13 (0.02)	0.26* (0.07)	0.10 (0.01)
iTG CoP	FP Mean Excursion ML	FP Velocity AP	SP Velocity AP	Turn Mean Excursion ML

VOMS Score	−0.16 (.03)	−0.39* (0.15)	−0.36* (0.13)	0.30* (0.09)
NPC	−0.08 (.01)	−0.15 (0.03)	−0.12 (0.01)	0.13 (0.02)

Significant correlation at P<0.05; FP: first pass; SP: second pass; AP: anteroposterior; ML: mediolateral; VOMS: vestibular ocular motor screening exam; NPC: near point convergence

Table 2. Spearman’s rho correlations (R2) between VOMS Score and NPC to significant group difference Tandem gait times along with center of pressure variables on the instrumented tandem gait.

Table 2. Spearman’s rho correlations (R²) between VOMS Score and NPC to significant group difference Tandem gait times along with center of pressure variables on the instrumented tandem gait.