Kumar 2005.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
Baseline immunosuppression
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | 'Randomization was completed using the first generator plan from randomization.com.' |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes are objective hard endpoints |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | ITT analysis performed; all patients followed up or accounted for |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcomes for this review reported |
Other bias | High risk | First 17 patients (38%) in withdrawal group received steroids until day 7 and two additional doses of basiliximab, the remaining 28 patients (62%) received steroids until day 2 and no additional basiliximab 'The study was funded internally by clinical revenue. The manuscript was support by an unrestricted educational grant from Novartis Pharm. Corp.' |