Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;32:102854. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102854

Table 3.

Performance comparison on the Cornell MS testing dataset (39 scans from 39 patients). Bolded and underlined numbers refer to the metrics with the best and the second-best performance, respectively.

Methods Score DSC LFPR LTPR Precision Sensitivity VC L-F1 V-F1
ALL-Net (proposed) 0.842 0.755 0.301 0.917 0.781 0.748 0.983 0.793 0.764
LST-LPA (Schmidt et al., 2012) 0.705 0.558 0.527 0.866 0.661 0.526 0.872 0.611 0.586
U-Net (Çiçek et al., 2016) 0.795 0.727 0.465 0.937 0.736 0.738 0.977 0.681 0.737
Tiramisu (Zhang et al., 2019a) 0.804 0.723 0.432 0.926 0.752 0.710 0.984 0.704 0.730
nn-Unet (Isensee et al., 2021) 0.806 0.697 0.248 0.813 0.696 0.719 0.963 0.782 0.707