Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;2021(10):CD012679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012679.pub2

Huhn‐Matesic 2015.

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling Unclear
Patient characteristics and setting Regional non‐critical care stroke unit. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria not reported
Index tests EHMBAS followed by simple WST; interpretation not reported
Target condition and reference standard(s) MASA
Flow and timing All patients received the index test(s) and reference standard. All patients were included in the 2 × 2 table
Interventions between index/reference tests: not reported
Interval between tests: not reported
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
Was a two‐gate design avoided? Yes    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   Unclear risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (All tests)
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias?   Unclear risk  
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question?     Unclear
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Unclear risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     Low concern
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Unclear    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   Unclear risk