Huhn‐Matesic 2015.
Study characteristics | |||
Patient Sampling | Unclear | ||
Patient characteristics and setting | Regional non‐critical care stroke unit. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria not reported | ||
Index tests | EHMBAS followed by simple WST; interpretation not reported | ||
Target condition and reference standard(s) | MASA | ||
Flow and timing | All patients received the index test(s) and reference standard. All patients were included in the 2 × 2 table Interventions between index/reference tests: not reported Interval between tests: not reported |
||
Comparative | |||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Unclear | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Unclear | ||
Was a two‐gate design avoided? | Yes | ||
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias? | Unclear risk | ||
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question? | Unclear | ||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (All tests) | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Yes | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | Unclear | ||
Could the conduct or interpretation of the index test have introduced bias? | Unclear risk | ||
Are there concerns that the index test, its conduct, or interpretation differ from the review question? | Unclear | ||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Yes | ||
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias? | Unclear risk | ||
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question? | Low concern | ||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Unclear | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Unclear | ||
Could the patient flow have introduced bias? | Unclear risk |