Table 4.

Post Hoc ANOVA Contrast of Average Marginal Effects

Race	Contrasts	95% CI	p Value	Contrasts	95% CI	p Value
	Period 1: 1998–2004 Unadjusted			Period 1: 1998–2004 Fully adjusted
NHB vs. NHW	3.6	2.2 to 5.0	<.001***	0.3	–0.8 to 1.4	.58
HE vs. NHW	0.6	−1.5 to 2.7	.58	–0.6	–3 to 1.8	.63
HS vs. NHW	–1.8	–3.7 to 0.1	.06	–4.3	–5.7 to –2.8	<.001***
	Period 2: 2004–2010 Unadjusted			Period 2: 2004–2010 Fully adjusted
NHB vs. NHW	5.4	3.2 to 7.6]	<.001***	1.9	0.2 to 3.6	.03*
HE vs. NHW	–0.2	–2.7 to 2.3	.87	–1.8	–4.1 to 0.4	.10
HS vs. NHW	0.9	–2.8 to 4.5	.64	–2.2	–4.8 to 0.3	.09

Notes: CI = confidence interval; HE = English-speaking Hispanics; HS = Spanish-speaking Hispanics; NHB = non-Hispanic Blacks (Blacks); NHW = non-Hispanic Whites (Whites). 95% CI is reported inside the parenthesis. Estimates are based on crude and fully adjusted logistic regression models. All statistical tests are compared to the referent group (“NHW”). In the crude logistic model, covariates include only race. In the fully adjusted model, covariates include age, gender, marital status, income (in tertiles), wealth (in tertiles), education, insurance plan, self-reported health status, smoking prevalence, drinking prevalence, body mass index, number of living parents, number of siblings, and number of children.

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.