Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;73(2):226–234. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa583

Table 4.

Diagnostic Validity of Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assays on Stool Specimen Compared With Culture Results of Induced Sputum Specimen Among Children (< 15 Years of Age) With Presumptive Pulmonary Tuberculosis Enrolled From Selected 4 Tertiary Care Hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 2018–April 2019 (N = 447)

Investigation Culture on Induced Sputum Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Specificity, % (95% CI)
Positive Negative
No. (%)a No. (%)a
Total 9 (100.0) 438 (100.0)
Xpert MTB/RIF
 Positive 7 (77.8) 4 (0.9) 77.8 (45.3–93.7) 99.1 (97.7–99.6)
 Negative 2 (22.2) 434 (99.1)
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultrab
 Positive 8 (88.9) 52 (11.9) 88.9 (56.5–98.0) 88.1 (84.7–90.8)
 Negative 1 (11.1) 385 (88.1)
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (trace call as negative)b
 Positive 7 (77.8) 5 (1.1) 77.8 (45.3–93.7) 98.9 (97.4–99.5)
 Negative 2 (22.2) 432 (98.9)

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

aColumn percentage.

bOne stool specimen showed invalid result on Xpert Ultra assay.