Table 3.
References | Location | Study design | Number of participants | Demographics of participants | Research objective | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bond et al. (33) | UK | Qualitative online semi-structured asynchronous interviews | 26 | 46% male 35% female 19% unidentified |
To assess the opinions of diabetes discussion board users concerning their views about health researchers using their posts | Aggregated data can be used by researchers, but no consensus on the views of using individual information |
Mikal et al. (34) | USA | Semi-structured focus group interviews | 26 | 65% male 31% female 4% unidentified Average age, 26.9 years |
To assess public views toward using Twitter data for population mental health monitoring | Relatively positive view to using Twitter data provided data are aggregated |
Monks et al. (35) | Australia | Focus group interviews | 48 | Aged 13–14 | To assess how young people perceive the use of social media for health and well-being research | Concerns regarding privacy, consent, and practicality but also recognize the benefits, and are open to social media research if appropriate consent and confidentiality were ensured |
Moreno et al. (36) | USA | Interviews following public Facebook profiles being identified | 132 | 48.8% male 51.2% female Average age, 18.4 years |
To assess how older adolescents feel regarding being identified for a study via there Facebook profiles | Most adolescents had a positive view toward the use of Facebook for research, but those who were uneasy or concerned showed confusion toward profile security settings |