Table 1.

Details of experiments included in the meta-analysis.

study	prime type	dependent variable	N (prime)	N (control)	effect size (d)
Bipp et al. ([50], Exp. 1)	photograph	exam grade	42	41	0.46
Bipp et al. ([50], Exp. 2, photo runner)	photograph	exam grade	33	36	0.13
Bipp et al. ([50], Exp. 2, photo grade)	photograph	exam grade	29	36	0.77
Itzchakov & Latham ([25,40], Exp. 4)	photograph	customer satisfaction	19	18	1.61
Itzchakov & Latham ([25,40], Exp. 3)	photograph	customer satisfaction	31	31	1.10
Latham & Piccolo ([52], context-specific prime)	photograph	number of donor pledges	17	18	1.20
Latham & Piccolo ([52], general achievement prime)	photograph	number of donor pledges	19	18	0.65
Lenoir & Matthews ([51], runner)	photograph	canvassing	51	53	0.27
Lenoir & Matthews ([51], canvasser)	photograph	canvassing	54	53	0.06
Shantz & Latham ([24], Field Exp.)	photograph	money raised	40.5	40.5	0.49
Shantz & Latham ([53], Study 1)	photograph	money raised	10	10	0.95
Shantz & Latham ([53], Study 2)	photograph	money raised	22	22	0.60
Stajkovic et al. ([49], Exp. 1)	words	call-handling time	23	23	0.82