Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;119:84–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.07.014

Table V.

Results of methods to recondition personal protective equipment

Study Virus Disinfectant Disinfection phase Exposure time Reduction of viral infectivity (log10) or (%) Effect on material properties and functionality
1 Blanchard et al. (2020) IAV and RSV Ozone (20 ppm) + 50–70% RH Surgical facemasks (1 cm x 1 cm sample swatches) 40 min Equal to 70% ethanol inactivation Material properties were preserved and filtration capacity of masks was maintained.
Tyvek (disposable gown) 1 cm x 1 cm
N95 respirators 1 cm x 1 cm
Bunny suits 1 cm x 1 cm
PAPR hoods 1 cm x 1 cm
2 Campos et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Ambient humidity (60%) without BSA Meltblown fabric from N95-grade FFRs 60°C for 30 min 2.16 ± 0.23 log10 Temperatures of 75–85 °C are able to efficiently inactivate the virus in 20–30 min under 100% RH, without lowering filtration efficiency. Filtration efficacy started to decrease significantly after 10 cycles with temperature of 95°C probably due to the absorption of water or other mechanisms that can decay the electrostatic charge.
Ambient humidity (60%) without BSA 75°C for 30 min 3.69 ± 0.32 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) without BSA 85°C for 20 min >4.77 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) without BSA 95°C for 5 min >4.77 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) with BSA 60°C for 30 min 1.07 ± 0.06 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) with BSA 75°C for 30 min 2.89 ± 0.31 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) with BSA 85°C for 20 min 4.3 ± 0.55 log10
Ambient humidity (60%) with BSA 95°C for 5 min 4.8 ± 0.44 log10
100% humidity without BSA 60°C for 30 min 2.82 ± 0.09 log10
100% humidity without BSA 75°C for 30 min >4.97 log10
100% humidity without BSA 85°C for 20 min >4.97 log10
100% humidity without BSA 95°C for 5 min >4.97 log10
100% humidity with BSA 60°C for 30 min 2.27 ± 0.09 log10
100% humidity with BSA 75°C for 30 min 4.92 ± 0.12 log10
100% humidity with BSA 85°C for 20 min >5.02 log10
100% humidity with BSA 95°C for 5 min >5.02 log10
3 Choi et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Moist heat generated by multi-cooker FFRs 3M Model 1860 in simulated saliva 65°C for 30 min ∼1.5 log10 All FFRs absorbed <1 g of water when in a paper bag. Collection efficacy exceeded 95% and inhalation resistance was preserved. After five cycles of moist heat treatment, 3M 8210 and NS 721 had no change in strap elasticity, while 3M 1860 and 3M 8511 showed a small change (<10%).
FFRs 3M Model 1860 in simulated lung fluid ∼3.2 log10
FFRs 3M Model 8511 in simulated saliva ∼2.5 log10
FFRs 3M Model 8511 in simulated lung fluid ∼3.2 log10
FFRs 3M Model 8210 in simulated saliva ∼2.2 log10
FFRs NS Model 7210 in simulated saliva ∼2.2 log10
4 Daeschler et al. (2020) SARS-Cov-2 70°C + 50% RH N95 respirators 2–18 min Reduced to undetectable levels Masks maintained fibre diameters similar to untreated masks and continued to meet standards for fit, filtration efficiency and breathing resistance.
5 Gopal et al. (2020) SARS-Cov-2 Zinc oxide embedded into fabrics (only tested on PA66) Cotton, polypropylene (PPP) fabrics and polyamide (PA66) 60 min 2 log Cotton and polyamide 66 (PA66) can strongly trap viruses as only 56% of SARS-CoV-2 can be recovered from cotton samples and 92% from PA66 after viral inoculation. PPP is poor at trapping viruses.
6 Ibanez-Cervantes et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Hydrogen peroxide plasma N95 3M Model 8210 47 min Undetectable by RT-PCR Not tested
7 Ludwig-Begall et al. (2020) PRCV UV irradiation Surgical mask coupons 2 min ∼5 log10 Not tested
Vaporized H2O2 (59% liquid H2O2) 750 ppm 28 min ∼5 log10
Dry heat (102°C) 60 min ∼5.5 log10
UV irradiation Surgical mask straps 2 min ∼2.9 log10
Vaporized H2O2 (59% liquid H2O2) 750 ppm 28 min Non-significant
Dry heat (102°C) 60 min ∼1.2 log10
UV irradiation FFR coupons 4 min ∼3.2 log10
Vaporized H2O2 (59% liquid H2O2) 750 ppm 28 min ∼4 log10
Dry heat (102°C) 60 min ∼2.5 log10
UV irradiation FFR straps 4 min (-)
Vaporized H2O2 (59% liquid H2O2) 750 ppm 28 min ∼1.2 log10
Dry heat (102°C) 60 min (-)
8 Ma et al. (2020) Avian infectious bronchitis virus Steam N95 FFR masks 5 min Undetectable by RT-PCR Blocking efficacy of 99% verified in all masks except for one model that seemed to have thinner layers compared with other models. Therefore, masks with thinner layers can have reduced blocking efficacy.
9 Mantlo et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Clyraguard copper iodine complex undiluted Suspension test 10 min 2 log Not tested
30 min Below limit of detection (<75 TCID50 per mL)
60 min Below limit of detection (<75 TCID50 per mL)
10 Ozog et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 UV-C irradiation (1.5 J/cm2 to each side) N95 FFR models (3M 1860, 8210, 8511, 9211; Moldex 1511) 60–70 s (for each side) Below limit of detection (101.3 TCID50/4 mm punch) Not tested
11 Perkins et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Dry heat (60°C) N95 respirator coupons + parchment paper 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect Not tested
Dry heat (70°C) 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Dry heat (75°C) 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Dry heat (60°C) N95 respirator coupons + tissue culture (-) (-)
Dry heat (70°C) 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Dry heat (75°C) 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Dry heat (60°C) Intact N95 respirators (-) (-)
Dry heat (70°C) 60 min All samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Dry heat (75°C) 60 min Most samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
Ambient temperature 5 days 5/9 samples were positive analysed by microscopy for cytopathic effect
12 Rathnasinghe et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 UV-C irradiation (5.43 mW/cm2) N95 mask squares 120 s per side 3.5 log Not tested
13 Rockey et al. (2020) Bacteriophage MS2 Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + PBS N95 respirator coupons 30 min 0.24 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 0.19 log10 (82°C + 1% RH) Not tested
6.87 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 6,90 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + DMEM-A 1.44 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 2.77 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
6.56 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 7.16 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + saliva 0.99 log 10 (72°C + 13% RH), 0.88 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
1.45 log 10 (72°C + 25% RH), 1.74 log10 (82°C + 13% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + (PBS + BSA) 1.5 log 10 (72°C + 13% RH), 0.77 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
2.72 log 10 (72°C + 25% RH), 3.56 log10 (82°C + 13% RH)
Bacteriophage phi6 Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + PBS 0.99 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 1.48 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
6.79 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 6,70 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + DMEM-A 2.58 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 3.87 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
6.81 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 7.63 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + saliva 0.95 log 10 (72°C + 13% RH), 1.09 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
1.69 log 10 (72°C + 25% RH), 2.62 log10 (82°C + 13% RH)
Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + (PBS + BSA) 1.33 log 10 (72°C + 13% RH), 0.76 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
1.34 log 10 (72°C + 25% RH), 1.98 log10 (82°C + 13% RH)
MHV Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + DMEM-A 2.51 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 3.30 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
4.19 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 4.38 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
IAV Temperature (72°C and 82°C) + DMEM-A 1.25 log 10 (72°C + 1% RH), 2.71 log10 (82°C + 1% RH)
3.71 log 10 (72°C + 89% RH), 3.37 log10 (82°C + 89% RH)
14 Glasbrenner et al. (2021) TGEV UV (300–400 nm) simulated sunlight FFR 3M 1860 (-) (-) All FFRs maintained collection efficacy and breathing resistance after one and five cycles ((Model 3M 8210 not tested for five cycles). Reduced strap elasticity from NS 7210 model with 19% change in stress).
FFR 3M 8210 (-) (-)
FFR 3M 8511 (-) Inactivation less efficient
FFR NS 7210 (-) Inactivation below level of detection
SARS-CoV-2 FFR 3M 1860 + SS and LF 20 min (13.3 J cm2) SS/40 min (26.5 J cm2) FL Inactivation below level of detection
FFR 3M 8210 + SS and LF (-) (-)
FFR 3M 8511 + SS and LF 60 min (37.8 J cm2) for SS and FL Complete inactivation
FFR NS 7210 + SS and LF 20 min (13.3 J cm2) for SS and LF Inactivation below level of detection
15 Uppal et al. (2021) HCoV-OC43 Ozone (20 ppm) N95 FFRs 10 min 98.1411% Not tested
Ozone (25 ppm) 10 min 97.4138%
15 min 99.9947%
20 min 99.9966%
Ozone (50 ppm) 10 min 99.9860%
15 min 99.9956%
20 min 99.9925%
16 Valdez-Salas et al. (2021) Enveloped H5N1 avian influenza virus Formulated disinfectant - 0.2% benzalkonium chloride, 85% ethanol-water, 0.03% triclosan, 10% silver nanoparticles, 0.3% lauryl alcohol ethoxylate, 0.2% Triton X-100, 2% citric acid, microdacyn Suspension test 15 min No presence of haemagglutinine - complete inactivation Not tested

IAV, avian influenza virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; PRCV, porcine respiratory coronavirus; IBV, avian infectious bronchitis virus; MHV, mouse hepatitis coronavirus; PAPR, powered air purifying respirator; FFR, filtering facepiece respirator; RH, relative humidity; UV-C, ultraviolet C irradiation; PSB, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium; SS, simulated saliva; FF, lung fluid.