Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 11;61(7):1053–1061. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab005

Table 3.

Multivariable Models of Associations Between Neighborhood Walkability and Self-Reported Walking in the Past Week in Older Adults

Adjusteda model without interaction (n = 545) Adjusteda model in cognitive maintainers (n = 267) Adjusteda model in cognitive decliners (n = 278)
Walkability variable OR (95% CI) p for interaction OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Land use/destinations
 Mixed land use 1.61 (1.12, 2.30) .8
 Transit available 0.95 (0.65, 1.40) .4
Safety
 Abandoned property 0.82 (0.52, 1.30) .16 0.54 (0.23, 1.26) 1.07 (0.56, 2.02)
 Undeveloped land 0.87 (0.57, 1.33) .8
 Larger street size 1.23 (0.66, 2.31) .3
Physical barrier
 Slope present 0.70 (0.47, 1.04) .05 1.05 (0.63, 1.73) 0.51 (0.29, 0.90)
 Less than perfect sidewalk quality 0.61 (0.38, 0.96) .05 0.38 (0.19, 0.76) 0.81 (0.46, 1.40)
 6+ steps at entranceb 1.06 (0.67, 1.68) .8
Residence
 Type of homec
  Single family Ref Ref
  Multifamily 1.41 (0.96, 2.08) .8
  Senior residence 2.14 (1.27, 3.60) .3

Notes: CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. Multiplicative interactions with cognitive maintainer status and analyses stratified by cognitive maintainer status where p for interaction < .2 are shown. Bolded values indicate significant associations.

aAdjusted for gender, race, usual gait speed; robust regression accounting for clustering at census block level. b n = 480; c n = 541.