Table 1:
Midazolam increases evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs)
| Vehicle (DMSO) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (raw values) | Steady-state (raw values) | Normalized Values | |||||||
| n | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | Amplitude (pA) | |||
| 10 | −4.4 ± 0.4 | −120 ± 13 | −4.6 ± 0.3 | −105 ± 9 | 108 ± 7 | 95 ± 7 | |||
| Midazolam | |||||||||
| Baseline (raw values) | Steady-state (raw values) | Normalized Values | |||||||
| Conc (μM) | n | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | p-value Charge | Amplitude (pA) | p-value Amplitude |
| 0.3 | 11 | −7.0 ± 1.3 | −170 ± 26 | −8.6 ± 0.9* | −180 ± 20 | 140 ± 14 | 0.052 | 120 ± 10 | 0.10 |
| 1 | 17 | −9.0 ± 1.2 | −180 ± 16 | −13 ± 2.3** | −230 ± 30 | 160 ± 14# | 0.019 | 130 ± 10# | 0.039 |
| 10 | 6 | −7.7 ± 1.2 | −200 ± 29 | −9.8 ± 1.1* | −190 ± 20 | 130 ± 12 | 0.090 | 110 ± 6.7 | 0.090 |
| Diazepam | |||||||||
| Baseline (raw values) | Steady-state (raw values) | Normalized Values | |||||||
| Conc (μM) | n | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | Amp (pA) | Charge (pA*ms) | p-value Charge | Amplitude (pA) | p-value Amplitude |
| 2 | 9 | −8.0 ± 1.4 | −230 ± 39 | −13 ± 2.0** | −300 ± 58* | 170 ± 14## | 0.0010 | 130 ± 9.5## | 0.0099 |
Raw values are averages of baseline and steady-state values from eIPSCs. Values shown are mean ± SEM. Data were collected and analyzed as described in Figure 1. Steady-state values are significantly different in the steady state period than in baseline if labelled (paired Student’s t-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). Normalized values for midazolam and diazepam are significantly different in comparison to vehicle control (one-way ANOVA, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01). p-values are shown for normalized drug conditions compared to vehicle conditions.