. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2021 Apr 18;142:103865. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103865

Table 2.

Interactions of negative affect and urgency with ESST NSSI response inhibition to self-harm stimuli predicting NSSI urge.

	IV: Negative Affect			IV: Urgency
	Est.	95% CI	P	Est.	95% CI	P
Predictors
Intercept	−1.85	[−8.35, 4.66]	.581	−0.72	[−7.06, 5.61]	.822
Occasion-level	0.42	[−0.32, 0.52]	< .001	0.39	[0.32, 0.46]	< .001
Day-level	0.60	[0.50, 0.70]	< .001	0.67	[0.58, 0.75]	< .001
Person-level	0.74	[0.32, 1.17]	.001	1.37	[0.76, 1.97]	< .001
ESST NSSI RI	0.25	[−3.11, 3.61]	.881	−0.37	[−3.66, 2.92]	.827
Occasion-level × ESST
NSSI RI	0.83	[0.24, 1.43]	.011	0.40	[0.07, 0.73]	.016
Covariates
Study day	−0.05	[−0.10, −0.004]	.031	−0.02	[−0.06, 0.02]	.349
Age	−0.11	[−0.44, 0.21]	.501	−0.16	[−0.48, 0.16]	.320

Note. N = 60 individuals, 1,427 observations. CI = confidence interval. ESST = Emotional Stop-Signal Task, RI = Response Inhibition. Results presented are from Poisson models.