Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2021 Apr 18;142:103865. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103865

Table 3.

Interactions of negative affect and urgency with ESST NSSI response inhibition to self-harm stimuli predicting NSSI urge, adjusting for neutral response inhibition.

IV: Negative Affect IV: Urgency
Est. 95% CI P Est. 95% CI P
Predictors
Intercept −2.58 [−9.61, 4.45] .472 −1.18 [−8.00, 5.64] .735
Occasion-level 0.40 [0.19, 0.61] <.001 0.30 [0.16, 0.44] <.001
Day-level 0.60 [0.50, 0.70] <.001 0.66 [0.58, 0.74] <.001
Person-level 0.73 [0.31, 1.16] .001 1.33 [0.73, 1.93] <.001
ESST NSSI RI −0.24 [−3.70, 3.21] .890 −0.38 [−3.73, 2.96] .822
Occasion-level × ESST
NSSI-RI 0.85 [0.20, 1.5] .010 0.24 [−0.14, 0.62] .211
Covariates
ESST Neutral-RI 1.56 [−2.79, 5.90] .482 0.13 [−4.10, 4.37] .951
Occasion-level × ESST
Neutral-RI 0.06 [−0.56, 0.69] .842 0.29 [−0.10, 0.67] .142
Study day −0.05 [−0.1, −0.004] .033 −0.02 [−0.07, 0.02] .334
Age −0.10 [−0.43, 0.23] .548 −0.14 [−0.46, 0.18] .393

Note. N = 60 individuals, 1,427 observations. CI = confidence interval. ESST = Emotional Stop-Signal Task, RI = Response Inhibition. Results presented are from Poisson models.