Table 1.
Current knowledge | Limitations of current studies | |
---|---|---|
Toxicity in vitro/in vivo | PD, DLB and MSA α-syn strains are able to induce neurological deficits or neurodegeneration in vitro or in vivo. However, MSA-derived fibrils seem to have a stronger toxic potential (61, 72–74, 83). | • Use of different in vivo and in vitro models between studies. • Use of different genetic backgrounds (overexpression of WT or mutant forms of α-syn VS non-transgenic models). |
Aggregation potential | PD, DLB and MSA α-syn strains are able to induce aggregation of endogenous α-syn in vitro and in vivo with MSA-derived α-syn showing higher aggregation potential (74–78, 83). | • Use of different sources of human α-syn (brain regions, age, sex, α-syn content). |
Biochemical properties | MSA, PD and DLB strains present different proteinase K resistance and sarkosyl solubility patterns with MSA fibrils showing the highest resistance to protein degradation and DLB – the lowest (77, 78, 81, 83). | • Use of non-standardized protocols among studies or different experimental techniques. |
Structural differences | MSA and PD fibrils exhibit twisted appearance, with MSA fibrils shoing higher twist frequency than PD fibrils. DLB fibrils are predominantly thinner with no twists (77, 81–83). | • Small number of cases included. • Limited number of studies including all α-synucleinopathies. |
Amplification kinetics | MSA strains exhibit different amplification kinetics compared to PD and DLB strains in PMCA and RT-QuIC studies (99–101). |