TABLE 1.
Comparison of properties of Albert’s diarrheal isolates to characteristic properties of H. alvei and E. coli strains
Test | Result for the following strainsa:
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. colib | H. alveib | ICDDRB strains
|
|||||
19982 | 9194 | 10457 | 10790 | 12502 | |||
Voges-Proskauer | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
KCN | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
Acetate | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
Acid from: | |||||||
Lactose | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
d-Sorbitol | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
MUG | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
Cephalothin | S | R | I | I | S | I | S |
Hafnia phage 1672 | − | + | − | − | − | − | − |
phoE gene probe | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
Abbreviations: +, ≥85% positive; −, ≤15% positive; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.
Typical profiles of each species (active E. coli, H. alvei) are from Farmer (6).