TABLE 2.
Results of pairwise meta-analysis.
Interven-tions | Included studies | OR/MD(95%CI) | P | Z | P | I2 (%) | Tau2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ovulation rate | |||||||
KT + LE vs LE | 5 | 3.52(2.06, 6.04) | 0.0000 | 4.59 | 0.94 | 0 | |
ZZ + LE vs LE | 2 | 8.30(2.76, 25.00) | 0.0002 | 3.76 | 0.96 | 0 | |
XJ + LE vs LE | 1 | 20.24(2.55, 160.32) | 0.004 | 2.85 | |||
YY + LE vs LE | 1 | 1.80(0.39, 8.32) | 0.45 | 0.75 | |||
DK + LE vs LE | 3 | 4.06(2.09, 7.91) | 0.0000 | 4.12 | 0.79 | 0 | |
Pregnancy rate | |||||||
KT + LE vs LE | 9 | 2.41(1.80, 3.22) | 0.0000 | 5.94 | 0.81 | 0 | |
ZZ + LE vs LE | 2 | 1.98(1.06, 3.72) | 0.03 | 2.13 | 0.98 | 0 | |
YY + LE vs LE | 1 | 1.41(0.45, 4.45) | 0.56 | 0.58 | |||
DK + LE vs LE | 3 | 3.76(2.15, 6.60) | 0.0000 | 4.62 | 0.99 | 0 | |
Endometrial thickness on the follicular maturity day | |||||||
KT + LE vs LE | 14 | 2.27(1.70, 2.84) | 0.0000 | 7.84 | 0.0000 | 94 | 0.97 |
ZZ + LE vs LE | 1 | 2.23(1.56, 2.90) | 0.0000 | 6.49 | |||
XJ + LE vs LE | 2 | 3.35(3.08, 3.62) | 0.0000 | 24.14 | 0.60 | 0 | 0.00 |
BL + LE vs LE | 1 | 1.16(0.38, 1.94) | 0.004 | 2.91 | |||
DK + LE vs LE | 3 | 1.63(0.58, 2.68) | 0.002 | 3.05 | 0.0000 | 91 | 0.77 |