Estimated occupancy, other parameters, and variance in the west Chure

Pr (leopard presence in the 1st replicate), that is, (${\widehat{\theta }}_0$($\widehat{\mathit{SE}}$(${\widehat{\theta }}_0$)))	0.1711 (0.027)
Pr (leopard presence in a replicate/grid occupied and which was absent in the previous replicate), that is, $\widehat{\theta }$($\widehat{\mathit{SE}}$($\widehat{\theta }$))	0.1404 (0.091)
Pr (leopard presence in a replicate/grid occupied and was present in the previous replicate), that is, ${\widehat{\theta }}_1$($\widehat{\mathit{SE}}$(${\widehat{\theta }}_1$))	0.615 (0.009)
Pr (detecting leopard sign on a replicate/grid occupied), that is, $\widehat{\mathit{Pt}}$($\widehat{\mathit{SE}}$($\widehat{\mathit{Pt}}$))	0.3170 (0.299)
Pr (the total fraction of the area occupied by leopards in the west Chure range), that is, $\widehat{\mathrm{\Psi }}$ ($\widehat{\mathit{SE}}$($\widehat{\mathrm{\Psi }}$))	0.7069 (0.047)
Naïve occupancy of leopard from the traditional present/absent approach in the west Chure range	0.34