Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;2:591592. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2020.591592

Table 3.

Respondents decisions to alter or extend research due to Canadian regulation barriers (N = 93).

Public sector Private sector
Agree Disagree No response Agree Disagree No response
I decided not to undertake a research proposal or develop an innovation because I self-determined the innovation would be considered novel. 22% 31% 5% 12% 17% 13%
I altered my/our breeding objective to avoid having a product reviewed as novel in Canada. 15% 32% 11% 4% 20% 17%
I had a product in a pathway to commercialization in Canada, but I did not proceed as I found out the product would be considered novel. 3% 38% 17% 3% 22% 17%
I conducted extra research to provide evidence to Canadian regulators that our innovation should not be considered novel. 8% 31% 19% 13% 15% 14%
I experienced delays introducing a new variety in Canada compared to other markets due to the novelty trigger. 9% 27% 23% 9% 16% 17%