Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;109(1):139–148. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00531-x

Table 3.

Marginal gap formation (%) at approximal cavity outline at enamel and dentin before/after artificial ageing

Composite Adhesive Enamel Dentin
Before artificial ageing After artificial ageing Before artificial ageing After artificial ageing
SDR Optibond FL 5.6 ± 5.7A,C 24.5 ± 10.7C 0.8 ± 1.8a 21.9 ± 24.1a
Xeno V+ 19.4 ± 10.0A,D 38.1 ± 18.1D,H 7.2 ± 7.5 22.0 ± 22.6
x-tra base Optibond FL 15.4 ± 9.4E 31.5 ± 19.8E 3.6 ± 4.3b 37.4 ± 27.5b,e
Xeno V+ 26.1 ± 9.7F 54.8 ± 8.9F 17.5 ± 23.2c 60.0 ± 22.0c,f
Tetric EvoCeram BF Optibond FL 9.3 ± 7.1 15.7 ± 10.6 8.9 ± 9.2 20.0 ± 21.8
Xeno V+ 27.8 ± 11.8 30.5 ± 11.3H 5.5 ± 6.1 12.1 ± 12.9f,g
Premise Optibond FL 6.6 ± 2.6B,G 21.6 ± 7.9G 6.2 ± 10.0 9.6 ± 16.3e
Xeno V+ 25.6 ± 13.0B 33.4 ± 19.9 5.1 ± 3.0d 26.3 ± 17.1d,g

Means followed by the same superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05)