Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 19;35(11):3094–3101. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01305-z

Table 2.

The univariate analysis for association between FA features at the vascular-avascular junction with development of treatment-requiring ROP (N = 98 eyes).

FA characteristics # eyes Treatment (%) OR (95% CI) P valuea (linear trend p valueb)
Finger-like anastomosis 0.20 (0.73)
 None 19 5 (26.3%) 1
 Mild 28 7 (25.0%) 0.93 (0.24, 3.64)
Moderate or severe 21 6 (28.6%) 1.12 (0.24, 5.13)
 Ungradable 30 3 (10.0%) 0.31 (0.09, 1.03)
 Shunts 0.04 (0.008)
 None/mild 24 2 (8.3%) 1
 Moderate 21 6 (28.6%) 4.40 (0.92, 21.0)
 Severe 22 10 (45.5%) 9.17 (1.65, 50.8)
 Ungradable 31 3 (9.7%) 1.18 (0.18, 7.86)
Tangles 0.10 (0.12)
 None 16 1 (6.3%) 1
 Mild 23 8 (34.8%) 8.00 (0.86, 74.6)
 Moderate 20 7 (35.0%) 8.08 (0.84, 77.9)
 Severe 8 2 (25.0%) 5.00 (0.39, 64.3)
 Ungradable 31 3 (9.7%) 1.61 (0.15, 17.0)
Hyperfluorescent lesions 0.01 (0.002)
 None 38 2 (5.3%) 1
 Mild 18 9 (50.0%) 18.0 (3.07, 106)
 Moderate/severe 11 7 (63.6%) 31.5 (4.81, 206)
 Ungradable 31 3 (9.7%) 1.93 (0.43, 8.58)
Leakage 0.02 (0.007)
 None 24 1 (4.2%) 1
 Mild 30 10 (33.3%) 11.5 (1.29, 103)
 Moderate/severe 13 7 (53.9%) 26.8 (2.56, 282)
 Ungradable 31 3 (9.7%) 2.46 (0.24, 25.6)
Capillary obliteration 0.09 (0.01)
 None/mild/moderate 44 9 (20.5%) 1
 Severe 25 9 (36.0%) 2.19 (0.76, 6.32)
 Ungradable 29 3 (10.3%) 0.45 (0.11, 1.81)

aFor comparison of treatment rate difference across all groups of grading including ungradable, and inter-eye correlation was accounted for by using Generalized estimating equation.

bThe comparison of treatment rate difference across groups excluding ungradable using test of linear trend, and inter-eye correlation was accounted for by using Generalized estimating equation.