Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr 20;62(5):987–996. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.027

Table 4.

Stakeholder Ratings of the Acceptability of the Final Intervention

Statement M SD
1. The video describes the options available related to palliative care. 3.76 0.44
2. The video makes it possible to understand the positive and negative features of palliative care. 3.43 0.60
3. The video describes palliative care in a way that allows people to understand that it can help physically. 3.90 0.30
4. The video describes palliative care in a way that allows people to understand that it can help psychologically. 3.43 0.60
5. Video development involved finding out what patients/families wanted the video to say about palliative care. * 3.83 0.41
6. Video development involved finding out what cancer clinicians wanted the video to say about palliative care. * 4.00 0.00
Average 3.78 0.44

N = 21 stakeholders: 7 internal who helped design video, 14 external stakeholders. Stakeholders rated each response on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Stakeholders primarily identified as patients (n=7, [3 internal]), caregivers (n=6, [2 internal]), or clinician-scientists (n=8, [2 internal]).

*

External stakeholders did not rate items 5-6