Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 19;11:20641. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00147-3

Table 5.

Results of GLMMs explaining variation in hare–vehicle collision points and random points without collisions in the study area.

Model k AICc
Tf − Dc + Em + Lh 5 811.473
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 817.349
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 820.819
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 868.006
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 868.390
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 907.247
Em + Lh 3 912.662
Tf − Dc + Em + Sl + Lh 6 924.308
− Dc + Em + Lh 4 1021.632
Null 1 1172.020

Tf traffic volume, Dc distance to nearest cross, Em presence of embankment, Sl speed limit, Lh landscape heterogeneity, k number of parameters, AICc Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes.