Garland 2019.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
Participants |
Substance: opioids Baseline characteristics Mindfulness‐based intervention
Control 1
Overall
Included criteria: 18 years or older, admitted to MMT in the past year, chronic non‐cancer pain, English speaking Excluded criteria: none Number missing: 0 Reason missing: n/a Baseline differences: not reported Age: 50.4 Percent female: 50% Race/Ethnicity: 53% African American, 36.7% White, 20% Hispanic |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Mindfulness‐based intervention
Control 1
|
|
Outcomes |
Treatment acceptability (attrition)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NCCAM, NIDA Country: USA Setting: not residential Authors name: Eric L. Garland Institution: University of Utah Email: eric.garland@socwk.utah.edu Address: College of Social Work and Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, University of Utah, 395 South, 1500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA COI: Eric Garland, PhD, LCSW is the Director of the Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development. The Center provides Mindfulness‐Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE), mindfulness‐based therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy in the context of research trials for no cost to research participants; however, Dr. Garland has received honoraria and payment for delivering seminars, lectures, and teaching engagements (related to training clinicians in MORE and mindfulness) sponsored by institutions of higher education, government agencies, academic teaching hospitals, and medical centers. Dr. Garland also receives royalties from the sale of books related to MORE. Diagnosis tool: receiving methadone maintenance therapy Diagnosis type: informal Funding: NCCAM, NIDA Journal: Drug and Alcohol Dependence Publication type: published report Secondary publications: none |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Judgement comment: no blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Treatment acceptability (attrition) | Low risk | Objective measure |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Judgement comment: similar attrition across groups and not lost to follow‐up |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Judgement comment: protocol available and not all outcomes reported |
Other bias: equivalence of baseline characteristics (selection bias) | Low risk | Judgement comment: no baseline differences |