Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;2021(10):CD011723. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011723.pub2

Mermelstein 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: randomized controlled trial
Study grouping: parallel group
Participants Substance: alcohol
Baseline characteristics
Mindfulness‐based intervention
  • Number randomized: 38


No treatment
  • Number randomized: 38


Overall
  • Number randomized: 76


Included criteria: 18 to 24, at least one binge drinking episode in past 2 weeks, full‐time non‐commuter student, not currently under the influence of alcohol or illicit substances
Excluded criteria: self‐reported diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder
Pretreatment: no differences on consequences of alcohol use at baseline, no other baseline between‐group tests reported
Number missing: 3
Reason missing: lost to follow‐up, reasons unknown
Baseline differences: no differences on consequences of alcohol use at baseline, no other baseline between‐group tests reported
Age: 19.1
Percent female: 50%
Race/Ethnicity: 91% white, 4% black, 4% multiracial, 1% Latino
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Mindfulness‐based intervention
  • Group name: Brief mindfulness intervention

  • Theory: Breath meditation (UCLA Mindful Awareness Research Center) and urge surfing (Bowen et al., 2011)

  • Duration: one session with homework assigned for 4 weeks

  • Timing: one time per week for 1 hour

  • Delivery: individual

  • Providers: 3 doctoral clinical psychology students

  • Co‐intervention: Cue exposure

  • Integrity: not reported

  • Compliance: assessed practices per week


Control 1: no treatment control
  • Co‐intervention: cue exposure

Outcomes Drinking episodes
  • Outcome type: continuous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Direction: lower is better

  • Data value: endpoint

  • Time point: post‐treatment


Total drinks per week
  • Outcome type: continuous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Direction: lower is better

  • Data value: endpoint

  • Time point: post‐treatment


Treatment acceptability (attrition)
  • Outcome type: dichotomous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Direction: lower is better

  • Data value: endpoint

  • Time point: post‐treatment

Identification Sponsorship source: none reported
Country: USA
Setting: not residential
Authors name: Liza C. Mermelstein
Institution: Brown University
Email: lizamermelstein@gmail.com
Address: Liza C. Mermelstein, Alpert Medical School of Brown University–Psychiatry and Human Behavior, 222 Richmond Street, Providence, RI 02903
COI: not reported
Diagnosis tool: at least one binge drinking episode in past 2 weeks
Diagnosis type: Informal
Funding: none reported
Journal: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
Publication type: published report
Secondary publications: none
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Judgement comment: no description
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Judgement comment: not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Judgement comment: no blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Treatment acceptability (attrition) Low risk Objective measure
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All non‐attrition outcomes High risk Self‐report
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Judgement comment: similar attrition rates but reasons not given
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Judgement comment: no protocol but clear statement of plausible primary outcomes
Other bias: equivalence of baseline characteristics (selection bias) Low risk Judgement comment: no baseline differences