Mermelstein 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomized controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
Participants |
Substance: alcohol Baseline characteristics Mindfulness‐based intervention
No treatment
Overall
Included criteria: 18 to 24, at least one binge drinking episode in past 2 weeks, full‐time non‐commuter student, not currently under the influence of alcohol or illicit substances Excluded criteria: self‐reported diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder Pretreatment: no differences on consequences of alcohol use at baseline, no other baseline between‐group tests reported Number missing: 3 Reason missing: lost to follow‐up, reasons unknown Baseline differences: no differences on consequences of alcohol use at baseline, no other baseline between‐group tests reported Age: 19.1 Percent female: 50% Race/Ethnicity: 91% white, 4% black, 4% multiracial, 1% Latino |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Mindfulness‐based intervention
Control 1: no treatment control
|
|
Outcomes | Drinking episodes
Total drinks per week
Treatment acceptability (attrition)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: none reported Country: USA Setting: not residential Authors name: Liza C. Mermelstein Institution: Brown University Email: lizamermelstein@gmail.com Address: Liza C. Mermelstein, Alpert Medical School of Brown University–Psychiatry and Human Behavior, 222 Richmond Street, Providence, RI 02903 COI: not reported Diagnosis tool: at least one binge drinking episode in past 2 weeks Diagnosis type: Informal Funding: none reported Journal: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Publication type: published report Secondary publications: none |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Judgement comment: no description |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Judgement comment: no blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Treatment acceptability (attrition) | Low risk | Objective measure |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All non‐attrition outcomes | High risk | Self‐report |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Judgement comment: similar attrition rates but reasons not given |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Judgement comment: no protocol but clear statement of plausible primary outcomes |
Other bias: equivalence of baseline characteristics (selection bias) | Low risk | Judgement comment: no baseline differences |