Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan 23;34(3):251–258. doi: 10.1086/669526

TABLE 3.

Linear Regression Models for Association between Contact Precautions and Depression (Model 1) or Anxiety (Model 2) on Hospital Day 3, Adjusting for Baseline Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety and Other Possible Confounding Factors

Depression (n = 296)
Anxiety (n = 296)
Adjusted difference (SE) P Adjusted difference (SE) P
Contact precautions 0.22 (0.36) .54 0.33 (0.34) .34
Female sex −0.50 (0.36) .17 −0.34 (0.33) .31
Age, per year −0.005 (0.01) .69 0.02 (0.01) .17
Charlson Comorbidity Index, per point 0.002 (0.09) .98 −0.03 (0.09) .77
Baseline HADS depression or anxiety scorea 0.74 (0.05) <.01 0.70 (0.44) <.01
History of depression or anxietyb 0.74 (0.42) .18 0.71 (0.42) .09
History of inpatient psychiatry admissionc 0.65 (0.58) .26 1.13 (0.57) .05
Some college education or greaterd 0.80 (0.42) .05 −0.18 (0.34) .61

note. Age, sex, and comorbidities were included a priori in each model.

a

Baseline depression score was added to the depression model and baseline anxiety score was added to the anxiety model.

b

History of depression was added to the depression model only and history of anxiety was added to the anxiety model only.

c

Two patients were excluded because of failure to provide a history of psychiatric admission.

d

One patient did not provide education history.