Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;12(5):1854–1862. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab016

TABLE 3.

Validity of bioelectrical impedance in multi-ethnic and minority samples of healthy adults1

Study Criterion Outcome n Race/ethnicity Sex (%male) Age,2 y MD (±SD)3 TE3 SEE3 R 2 95% LOA
Bioelectrical impedance analysis
 Bosy-Westphal et al. (43) 4C FFM 130 Multi (31 Hispanic, 32 White, 31 Black, 36 Asian) 50 40.7 H: 0.4 (1.8) 1.9 −3.1 to 3.9
W: 0.7 (2.1) 2.1 −3.4 to 4.8
B: 1.5 (1.7)4 2.2 −1.8 to 4.8
A: 0.7 (1.8)4 1.9 −2.8 to 4.2
 Stolarczyk et al. (49) HW FFM 602 Multi (247 NA, 111 Hispanic, 244 White) 38.2 37.0 ± 13 (F) 0.14–3.17 (F)4 2.28–4.50 2.22–3.02 0.73–0.86
33.5 ± 9.4 (M) 0.51–4.88 (M)4 3.62–7.23 3.59–5.21 0.76–0.89
 Lopez et al. (59) DXA %fat 74 Black 0 47.6 ± 7.7 1.8 4.7 0.41
 Wagner et al. (56) HW FFM 37 Black 100 30.8 ± 7.6 −3.3 2.7–6.0 2.1–3.9 0.79–0.83
 Stout et al. (57) HW %fat 20 Black 100 21.0 ± 3.0 7.04 9.4 5.9 0.32
 Aglago et al. (58) D2O FFM 125 North African 22.4 18–64 −3.0–0.04 (F)4 2.4–4.1 0.62–0.835
−2.5–0.97 (M)4 2.6–3.9 0.64–0.765
 Duerenberg et al. (52) 4C %fat 298 Asian (140 Chinese, 72 Malay, 86 Indian) 49.5 36.2 ± 12.0 (F) −0.7–1.5 (F) 4.5 0.76
41.9 ± 12.9 (M) 0.7–2.0 (M)4
 Kupper et al. (51) 3C %fat 41 Indonesian 43.9 21.2 ± 2.9 (F) 3.5 (2.4) (F)4 0.56 −1.2 to 8.2
28.1 ± 6.6 (M) 2.8 (4.3) (M)4 −5.6 to 11.2
 Vasudevan et al. (53) DXA %fat 155 Asian (Indian) 47 45.1 ± 9.0 4.54, 6 0.676 −9.47 to 13.9
0.77 0.557 −10.4 to 11.9
 Nigam et al. (54) DXA %fat 200 Asian (Indian) 50 36.3 ± 7.5 (F) −8.3 (3.9) 8 3.5–4.18 0.59–0.628 −20.1 to 9.4
37.1 ± 7.7 (M) −5.4 (4.3)9 3.5–4.39 0.54–0.639 −20.6 to 11.4
 Chen et al. (55) DXA FM 209 Chinese 51.2 27.6 ± 3.0 0.7 0.94
LBM 2.8 0.133 0.97
 Rising et al. (60) HW %fat 26 Native American 69.2 32 ± 10 0 (3) 3.22 0.85
5 (7) 6.89 0.49
 Stolarczyk et al. (42) 3C FFM 47 Native American 0 34.5 ± 9.9 0.7 2.57 2.38 0.8 ±4.9
 Stolarczyk et al. (61) 4C FFM 29 Hispanic 0 30.6 ± 5.5 −4.4–0.7 1.6–4.6 1.3–2.0 0.76–0.90
 Macias et al. (62) ADP FFM 77 Mexican 47 34.0 ± 7.6 −0.9 (2.8) 0.92 −6.6 to 4.8
 Forrester et al. (48) DXA FFM 84 Hispanic 83.3 34.4 ± 7.2 (F) −3.4 (2.6) 0.79 −8.5 to 1.7
36.9 ± 9.8 (M) 0.5 (3.4) 0.79 −6.1 to 7.2
Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy
 Gibson et al. (63) 4C %fat 146 Multi (50 White, 48 Black, 48 Hispanic) 50 33.1 ± 12.9 (F) 3.04 5.5 4.8 0.77
30.6 ± 13.6 (M) 0.24 5.1 5.2 0.71
 Wi-Young et al. (64) ADP %fat 143 African American 44.8 20.0 ± 2.9 (F) −0.2 0.52
21.7 ± 3.0 (M) −2.7 0.76
1

A, Asian; ADP, air displacement plethysmography; B, African American/Black; D2O, deuterium dilution; FFM, fat-free mass; FM, fat mass; H, Hispanic; HW, hydrostatic weighing; LBM, lean body mass; LOA, limits of agreement; MD, mean difference; NA, Native American; SEE, standard error of the estimate; TE, total error; W, Caucasian/White; %fat, body fat percentage; 3C, 3-compartment model; 4C, 4-compartment model.

2

Values are means ± SDs.

3

Units for FM, FFM, and LBM outcome variables are kg; units for %fat outcome variable are %.

4

Significant mean difference between criterion and bioelectrical impedance measure (P < 0.05).

5

Concordance correlation (ρC).

6

Hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis.

7

Leg bioelectrical impedance analysis.

8

Japanese-specific equation.

9

Caucasian-specific equation.