Table 5.
Results of associations between socioeconomic position and childhood ratio and distribution measures.
| Paper | Country | N | Age | Study or description of the population | SEP measure | Body composition measure | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willig et al. [75] | USA | 254 | 7–12 | Children from ongoing cross-sectional study, whose parents classified them through self-report as either African American, European American, or Hispanic American. | SEP | Trunk FMI | SEP was negatively associated with trunk FMI (all at p < 0.05). Increase in advantage was associated with decreases trunk FMI. |
| Cardel et al. [35] | USA | 267 | 7–12 | Children self-identifying as African American, European American, or Hispanic American from Birmingham, Alabama area. | SEP | Trunk FM, TAAT | Increase in social advantage associated with decreases in central adiposity. |
| Ness et al. [64] | UK | 5 917 | 10 | ALSPAC | Social Occupational Class | Trunk FM | No association |
| Magalhaes et al. [59] | Brazil | 183 | 4–7 | Children aged 4–7 from a retrospective cohort who were monitored for the first months of life by a support program to breastfeeding (PROLAC) in the city of Vicosa, southeast Brazil. | Mothers education, Income per capita | %Android Fat | No association |
| McCarthy et al. [61] | UK | 2 297 | 5–14 | Caucasian children from inner city London and from more affluent surrounding counties. | School Level SEP | Muscle:Fat Ratio | Lower muscle to fat ratio in low-income groups in all age groups, except for females aged 11–14. |
SEP Socioeconomic Position, FMI Fat Mass Index, TAAT Total abdominal adipose tissue, ALSPAC Avon longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.