Table 3.
Output of the CFIR-ERIC matching tool: top 10 ERIC strategies matched to the 13 identified CFIR barriers for current KLIK implementation
CFIR barriers | Cumulative Percent | 1. Relative advantage | 2. Adaptability | 3. Complexity | 4. Cost | 5. Structural Characteristics | 6. Tension for Change | 7. Compatibility | 8. Organizational Incentives & Rewards | 9. Leadership Engagement | 10. Available Resources | 11. Individual Stage of Change | 12. Champions | 13. Key Stakeholders |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERIC strategies | ||||||||||||||
Identify and prepare champions | 449% | 45% | 23% | 30% | 12% | 27% | 48% | 21% | 25% | 41% | 4% | 44% | 67% | 63% |
Promote adaptability | 312% | 24% | 73% | 40% | 16% | 23% | 17% | 45% | 4% | 9% | 4% | 28% | 11% | 17% |
Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators | 310% | 24% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 14% | 13% | 12% | 15% | 38% |
Alter incentive/ allowance structures | 305% | 28% | 0% | 7% | 44% | 18% | 22% | 10% | 71% | 32% | 17% | 32% | 7% | 17% |
Conduct local consensus discussions | 287% | 24% | 31% | 7% | 4% | 14% | 43% | 41% | 8% | 27% | 0% | 20% | 26% | 42% |
Inform local opinion leaders | 261% | 28% | 15% | 13% | 12% | 14% | 39% | 3% | 17% | 18% | 0% | 28% | 44% | 29% |
Access new funding | 226% | 10% | 0% | 3% | 72% | 5% | 0% | 3% | 38% | 9% | 78% | 0% | 4% | 4% |
Tailor strategies | 218% | 17% | 35% | 27% | 12% | 18% | 13% | 38% | 17% | 5% | 9% | 8% | 4% | 17% |
Create a learning collaborative | 218% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 8% | 18% | 9% | 14% | 13% | 5% | 9% | 28% | 19% | 33% |
Identify early adopters | 217% | 17% | 27% | 20% | 8% | 23% | 13% | 10% | 13% | 9% | 0% | 24% | 41% | 13% |
Percentages shown reflect the proportion of panelists [30] endorsing a strategy appropriate for that barrier