Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 15;30(11):3049–3061. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02586-3

Table 3.

Output of the CFIR-ERIC matching tool: top 10 ERIC strategies matched to the 13 identified CFIR barriers for current KLIK implementation

CFIR barriers Cumulative Percent 1. Relative advantage 2. Adaptability 3. Complexity 4. Cost 5. Structural Characteristics 6. Tension for Change 7. Compatibility 8. Organizational Incentives & Rewards 9. Leadership Engagement 10. Available Resources 11. Individual Stage of Change 12. Champions 13. Key Stakeholders
ERIC strategies
Identify and prepare champions 449% 45% 23% 30% 12% 27% 48% 21% 25% 41% 4% 44% 67% 63%
Promote adaptability 312% 24% 73% 40% 16% 23% 17% 45% 4% 9% 4% 28% 11% 17%
Assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators 310% 24% 31% 30% 16% 36% 35% 34% 13% 14% 13% 12% 15% 38%
Alter incentive/ allowance structures 305% 28% 0% 7% 44% 18% 22% 10% 71% 32% 17% 32% 7% 17%
Conduct local consensus discussions 287% 24% 31% 7% 4% 14% 43% 41% 8% 27% 0% 20% 26% 42%
Inform local opinion leaders 261% 28% 15% 13% 12% 14% 39% 3% 17% 18% 0% 28% 44% 29%
Access new funding 226% 10% 0% 3% 72% 5% 0% 3% 38% 9% 78% 0% 4% 4%
Tailor strategies 218% 17% 35% 27% 12% 18% 13% 38% 17% 5% 9% 8% 4% 17%
Create a learning collaborative 218% 7% 23% 33% 8% 18% 9% 14% 13% 5% 9% 28% 19% 33%
Identify early adopters 217% 17% 27% 20% 8% 23% 13% 10% 13% 9% 0% 24% 41% 13%

Percentages shown reflect the proportion of panelists [30] endorsing a strategy appropriate for that barrier