Table 2.
Hierarchical logistic regression results: conspiracy mentality as predictor of binary health and well-being outcomes eight months later
| χ2(df) | Nagelkerke R2 | B(se) | Wald | Exp(B) | CI95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got tested | ||||||
| Step 1 | 155.22(4)*** | 0.047 | ||||
| Step 2 | 0.15(1) | 0.005 | 0.006(0.016) | 0.15 | 1.006 | 0.975–1.038 |
| Tested positive | ||||||
| Step 1 | 98.11(4)*** | 0.101 | ||||
| Step 2 | 6.01(1)* | 0.107 | 0.100(0.041)* | 6.01 | 1.105 | 1.020–1.198 |
| Received a fine | ||||||
| Step 1 | 4.65(4) | 0.126 | ||||
| Step 2 | 0.10(1) | 0.128 | −0.124(0.395) | 0.10 | 0.883 | 0.408–1.915 |
| Received too many visitors | ||||||
| Step 1 | 457.35(4)*** | 0.145 | ||||
| Step 2 | 27.99(1)*** | 0.153 | 0.096(0.018)*** | 27.97 | 1.101 | 1.062–1.141 |
| Visited a party or bar | ||||||
| Step 1 | 605.48(4)*** | 0.247 | ||||
| Step 2 | 7.10(1)** | 0.249 | 0.068(0.026)** | 7.13 | 1.070 | 1.018–1.125 |
| Lost job | ||||||
| Step 1 | 230.71(4)*** | 0.123 | ||||
| Step 2 | 0.17(1) | 0.123 | −0.012(0.030) | 0.17 | 0.998 | 0.932–1.047 |
| Reduced income | ||||||
| Step 1 | 75.00(4)*** | 0.027 | ||||
| Step 2 | 5.86(1)* | 0.029 | 0.046(0.019)* | 5.88 | 1.047 | 1.009–1.086 |
| Experienced rejection | ||||||
| Step 1 | 43.87(4)*** | 0.033 | ||||
| Step 2 | 33.26(1)*** | 0.058 | 0.212(0.037)*** | 33.24 | 1.237 | 1.150–1.329 |
| Have rejected others | ||||||
| Step 1 | 22.23(4)*** | 0.011 | ||||
| Step 2 | 4.37(1)* | 0.013 | 0.056(0.027)* | 4.39 | 1.057 | 1.004–1.114 |
Note. Step 1 contains the control variables gender, age, political orientation, and education (details about their specific effects in online Supplementary Table S1). Step 2 adds conspiracy mentality to the regression model. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.