Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 2;24(11):103211. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103211

Table 2.

An overview of strengths and weaknesses for different mass analytical approaches

MP Orbitrap-based CDMS Conventional native MS
Environment Solution phase Gas phase Gas phase
“Nativeness” +++ + +
Typical acquisition time ∼5 min ∼10–60 min ∼5–15 min
Processing software Commercial Custom scripts Commercial
Sample consumption 1–10 nM 10 nM–1 μM 1–10 μM
Sample volume 1–10 μL 1–10 μL 1–10 μL
Resolution ∼4 ∼10 ∼100–200a
Accuracy <2% <2% <1%b
Typical molecule count 1e3-4 1e4-5c >1e6
Max reported mass ∼5 MDad ∼10 MDa ∼10 MDa
Detection limitations <50 kDa, low Kd z < 10+, buffer High heterogeneity, buffer
Dynamic range + ++ +++
Cost $ $$$ $$$
a

Based on the data from Figures S1 and S3.

b

Requires charge-state separation and is based on Van De Waterbeemd et al. (2017).

c

After data filtering.

d

Reported by the vendor.