. 2021 Oct 10;6(41):27552–27560. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04577

Table 1. Results Based on the Experimental Data of Wang et al., 2013⁵.

no.	evaluation^a	N_exper^b	reldev_N, %^c	E, kJ/mol	δlog₁₀ A	aver. ν
1.1	2013	12	10.2	220	0	0.88
1.2	regular	12	8.5	220	0	0.68
1.3	regular	8	8.5	219	0	0.72
1.4	A varies	12	7.1	200	0.05	0.76
1.5	A varies	8	7.2	198	0.06	0.73

The values in the first line characterize an evaluation of Wang et al., 2013,⁵ while the rest of the table belongs to the present study. The terms “regular” and “A varies” denote the two approaches explained in Section 2.4.

12 experiments were available for the evaluations. As a test, the evaluations were also carried out with only 8 experiments.

reldev_N is reldev₁₂ for Evaluations 1.1, 1.2, and 1.4, and it is reldev₈ for evaluations 1.3 and 1.4. (See further details in the text.)

Table 1. Results Based on the Experimental Data of Wang et al., 20135.

Table 1. Results Based on the Experimental Data of Wang et al., 2013⁵.