Table 2.
Ref.
|
Number of patients
|
Etiology
|
Type of study design
|
Case control analysis
|
Method
|
RFA device
|
Aim
|
Results
|
Steel et al[24] | 22 | CCC (n = 6) PC (n = 16) | Prospective | No | ERFA before SEMS | Habib EndoHPB | RFA catheter deployment, stent patency; adverse events (AE) | (1) 21/22 technical success; (2) 21/21 stent patency; 3/21 stent occlusion at 90 days; (3) AE 1 acute pancreatitis, 2 cholecystitis |
Figueroa-Barojas et al[26] | 20 | CCC (n = 11) PC (n = 7) IPMN (n = 1) Gastric cancer (n = 1) | Prospective | No | ERFA before stenting (metallic or plastic) | Habib EndoHPB | Stricture diameter size; adverse events | (1) Significant increase of 3.5 mm duct diameter post RFA (P value < 0.0001); (2) 2 AE (1 mild pancreatitis, 1 cholecystitis) |
Dolak et al[17] | 58 | MBO mainly CCC (n = 48) | Retrospective | No | ERFA + stenting, repeated ERFA for blocked SEMS, percutaneous RFA | Habib EndoHPB | Stent patency, survival adverse events, survival | (1) Median stent patency 170 d; Metal vs plastic stent (218 vs 115 d, P = 0.051); (2) Median survival 10.6 mo; (3) 12 AE (1 partial liver infarction, 5 Cholangitis, 2 hemobilia, 2 cholangiosepsis, 1 hepatic coma, 1 left bundle branch block) |
Sharaiha et al[28] | 69 | CCC (n = 45) PC (n = 19) GB (n = 2) Gastric cancer (n = 1) Colon cancer liver metastasis (n = 3) | Retrospective (multicentric registry) | No | Mainly ERFA before placing metallic or plastic stent | Habib EndoHPB | Survival; stricture diameter; Adverse events | (1) Median survival 11.46 mo; (2) Significant improvement in stricture diameter post-ablation (P < 0.0001); (3) AE 10% (1 pancreatitis 2 cholecystitis, 1 hemobilia, 3 abdominal pain) |
Laleman et al[25] | 18 | CCC, PC | Prospective | No | ERFA before stenting | ELRA | Feasibility, bilirubin level, survival and stent patency rate | (1) 6 AE (4 cholangitis, 2 pancreatitis); (2) Bilirubin level post-RFA decreased from 7.8 ± 1 mg/dL to 1.7 ± 0.4 mg/dL; P < 0.001; (3) Median survival of 227 d; (4) Stent patency 80% at 90 d and 69% at and 180 d respectively |
Inoue et al[20] | 41 | MBO mainly CCC (n = 27) GB (n = 9) | Retrospective | No | ERFA before bilateral stenting (uncovered metallic) | Habib EndoHPB | Technical success; adverse effect; recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) and stent patency rate | (1) Technical success was 95.1% (39/41); (2) 1 acute cholangitis, 1 cholecystitis, 1 nonocclusion cholangitis, 1 liver abcess; (3) RBO rate 38.5 % (15/39), and the median time to RBO was 230 d; (4) The median time to RBO was significantly longer in patients with strictures > 15 mm in length vs strictures ≤ 15 mm (314 vs 156 d; P = 0.02) |
CCC: Cholangiocarcinoma; PC: Pancreatic cancer; GB: Gallbladder cancer; IPMN: Intradu ctal papillary mucinous neoplasm; RBO: Recurrent biliary obstruction.